E-Edition | Shopper | Observer/Advocate

News and Sports from Windom, MN and surrounding areas | Windom, MN
The Weather Network
weather sponsored by


Advanced Search
search sponsored by


Road Construction

The Dish
Advertising
Legals
Help Wanted
Auctions
Area Churches
Area Sports Schedule
Flooding
Windom Schools
Social Scene
Weather
Birth Announcement Submission
Community Calendar
Cottonwood County Sheriff




home : opinion : letters to the editor
October 26, 2020


9/30/2020 11:01:00 AM
RRC referendum info needs clarification

I need to clarify information presented by Red Rock Central about the school referendum.
First, the school board had their minds made up to build a new school before the community-led task force, which I was a part, was convened. They didn't do maintenance for years, planning on a new building.
The cost to renovate the existing building wouldn't need to be $18.9 million. For example, they had new football field lighting in the renovation budget, but don't need it with a new school.
Windows that were replaced for energy efficiency now don't let enough light in. They also have "wants" listed as needs.
Secondly, the task force recommendation is for a new building. What they don't say is the vote was divided clearly by households that won't pay much for the building and landowners who pay most of the bill.
Residential property pays 5.1% of the bill. Agricultural taxpayers pay 86.8%. Commercial/industrial pays 8%. These percentages were presented to the task force.
Remember, in the four Red Rock Central communities most commercial property is farmer-owned co-ops.
I am tired of the board informing voters this will only cost us $9 a year. According to the 'Tax Impact 20 RRC Notice Rev" on the RRC website, 160 acres of non-homestead land valued at $6,000/acre X $5.25 (Annual Taxes Payable) is $840/year! That is $21,000 over the 25 years!
Think what the farmers' added expense will do to businesses and jobs. Most farmers will pay more in school taxes in 25 years than what an average local residential home costs.
According to Ehlers, our 880 acres will cost us $4,439/year more for just the building. Over 25 years that is $110,975. That's in addition to the $1,922.21 per year we currently pay.
This puts us at $6,361.21 per year - $159,030 over 25 years!
This will affect businesses and communities. Farmers will see increased rental rates from landlords (who cannot vote against the referendum because they don't live in the district).
If this district wants a new building it must be cost-effective and much less than $42 million dollars. Worthington's referendum for a 600-student building was $36 million. Please e-mail Ehlers to learn what it will cost you.
Finally, why pay $1.5 million to demolish the old building? The district didn't demolish schools in three other communities.
The only responsible vote is "NO." Have RRC come up with an affordable option!
- Glen Graff,
  Sanborn







Coronavirus National Headlines
iCitien
ObituariesClassifiedsOpinionColumnsThe DishLegalsContact UsHelp WantedAuctionsLife
Area Classified Ads | Life

 

Copyright © 2019 Citizen Publishing Co. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
P.O. Box 309, Windom, MN 56101 507-831-3455

 


Software © 1998-2020 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved